{"id":8241,"date":"2023-09-07T16:17:06","date_gmt":"2023-09-07T16:17:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/finance\/a-deep-dive-on-the-county-level\/"},"modified":"2023-09-07T16:17:07","modified_gmt":"2023-09-07T16:17:07","slug":"a-deep-dive-on-the-county-level","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241","title":{"rendered":"A Deep Dive on the County Level"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and sometimes, stark contrasts. But in every state, there exists a county where these contrasts are most palpable \u2014 where the divide between the opulent and the struggling is not just a mere line but a chasm. These are the counties with the highest income inequality, and their tales are a reflection of the broader American narrative, laying bare the challenges and complexities of the very promise of the American Dream.<\/p>\n<p>Using data sources from the Census Bureau\u2019s 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (the latest data available), we analyzed every single U.S. state in terms of the county with the highest income inequality, as measured by its Gini index. The Gini index or Gini coefficient is a measure of inequality of a distribution, in this case income, with a value of 0 expressing total equality and a value of 1 total inequality. A higher Gini index indicates greater inequality.<\/p>\n<p>Read on the find out the county with the worst income inequality in each state as well as what patterns and themes emerge that can better inform us about income inequality in America in general.<\/p>\n<p><fbs-ad position=\"inread\" progressive=\"\" ad-id=\"article-0-inread\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"presentation\"><\/fbs-ad><\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Alabama<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Pike County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5323<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $40,106<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $65,204<\/p>\n<p>Pike County is centered on the city of Troy, home to Troy University and another example of how college towns often feature high income inequality. Pike County is in southeastern Alabama, a little over 50 miles from Montgomery. Incomes are heavily divided, with 57.6% of households earning less than $50,000 a year while a full 20% of households earn $100,000 or more. The county\u2019s three largest industries by employment include Retail Trade, accounting for 14.5% of the workforce; Educational Services, accounting for 13.1% of the workforce; and Manufacturing, accounting for 11.9%. The county seat \u2014 Troy \u2014 itself exhibits strong income stratification, having a large gap between its median household income of $36,409 and its mean household income of $68,288. What\u2019s more, 58.7% of Troy households earn less than $50,000 per year against 20.5% who earn $100,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Alaska<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4752<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $43,405<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $57,989<\/p>\n<p>Alaska isn\u2019t divided up into counties as is the case in most other U.S. states. Instead, it is composed of a series of boroughs and Census Areas. In our study of the counties with the highest income inequality in each state, Alaska\u2019s equivalent is Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area. This census area covers a massive amount of land in central Alaska, boasting an area of nearly 148,000 square miles. Its two largest cities are Galena and Fort Yukon, both situated on the Yukon River, but with Galena far downstream to the southwest of Fort Yukon. The Gini index for Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area \u2014 0.4752 \u2014 is less than the 0.4818 index for the U.S. as a whole, and therefore this Alaskan census area is comparatively less unequal than many other counties in this study. Hence, the gap between its median household income and mean household income is smaller than, for example, Pike County\u2019s gap; and the latter county, not coincidentally, has a higher Gini coefficient.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Arizona<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Apache County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5055<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $34,788<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $48,645<\/p>\n<p>Apache County covers the northeast corner of Arizona and is shaped like a tall rectangle. The majority of the county is occupied by a portion of the federally recognized Fort Apache Reservation and Navajo Nation. Out of the 50 highest income inequality counties in our study, Apache County\u2019s Gini index of 0.5055 ranks 34<sup>th<\/sup>, which means it is toward the less extreme side of inequality. That said, Apache County is more unequal than the national Gini index of 0.4818. Rather than being a county polarized into impoverished households on one hand and super-wealthy households on the other, Apache County has high income inequality due to the startlingly high percentage of households earning less than $10,000 \u2014 19.9% \u2014 contrasted with the high percentage of middle-income households, with 24% earning $50,000 to $99,999. The top three industries by employment are Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting, representing 15.7% of the workforce; Health Care &amp; Social Assistance, accounting for 15.4%; and Manufacturing, accounting for 10.9%.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Arkansas<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Lee County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5806<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $29,082<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $54,648<\/p>\n<p>Lee County is in east-central Arkansas, with its eastern border being the Mississippi River. Centered on the county seat of Marianna, Lee County\u2019s Gini coefficient of 0.5806 made it rank No. 6 out of 50, having one of the highest rates of income inequality in the study. Although its average household income of $54,648 is far lower than the U.S.\u2019s corresponding figure of $97,196, it is the gap between Lee County\u2019s median and mean household income \u2014 which is over $25,500 \u2014 that really stands out. More than two-thirds of households (67.4%) earn less than $50,000, against 18.5% that earn $50,000 to $99,999 and 14.1% that earn $100,000 or more per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">California<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Tehama County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5145<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $52,901<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $79,138<\/p>\n<p>Tehama County is in northern California, centered on the county seat of Red Bluff, roughly a two-hour drive north of Sacramento. Tehama County\u2019s Gini index is approximately 7% higher than the U.S. Gini index of 0.4818, but when compared to the other 49 counties in this study, Tehama County\u2019s income inequality is on the lower end of the spectrum. Tehama County features a very large percentage of middle-income households earning $50,000 to $74,999 \u2014 17.4% of all households. Yet, at the same time, Tehama County is home to 47.6% of households earning less than $50,000 alongside 23.1% of households earning $100,000 or more. The county\u2019s main three industries are Health Care &amp; Social Assistance, which employs 13.9% of the workforce; Retail Trade, which employs 13.2% of the workforce; and Manufacturing, which employs 9.27% of the workforce.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Colorado<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Pitkin County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5480<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $92,708<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $172,473<\/p>\n<p>The county seat and biggest city in Pitkin County is Aspen, one of the most famous and affluent ski resort towns in the U.S. That Pitkin County is home to a place like Aspen and has the highest income inequality of all counties in Colorado highlights a more general theme of vacation and resort locations also tending to feature higher-than-average income inequality. In Pitkin County, the distribution of incomes is very skewed, with more than one fifth (21.9%) of households earning $200,000 or more per year. Furthermore, the percentage of households that earn less than $100,000 is approximately 52.4% versus households that earn $100,000 or more, which is 47.5%.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Connecticut<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Fairfield County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5425<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $101,194<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $164,837<\/p>\n<p>Connecticut\u2019s highest income inequality county \u2014 Fairfield County \u2014 is the also most populous county in Connecticut. Its location makes it particularly interesting, as it stretches from the southwestern corner of the state, right next to New York City, eastward to encompass four of Connecticut&#8217;s largest cities, including Bridgeport, Stamford, Norwalk, and Danbury. Fairfield County contains, for example, the city of Greenwich, which is one of the most affluent places in the U.S., as well as larger urban areas that have witnessed a decline in population and wealth over several decades. An incredible 23.9% of households in Fairfield County have a median household income of $200,000 or more. And more than half (50.5%) of households earn $100,000 or more a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Delaware<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Sussex County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4594<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $68,886<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $92,069<\/p>\n<p>Compared to the nation\u2019s overall income inequality \u2014 with a Gini index of 0.4818 \u2014 Sussex County might be the most unequal in Delaware, but it\u2019s less unequal than America as a whole. You can see this in the breakdown of income distribution. Approximately 36.4% of households earn less than $50,000, followed by 32.1% of households that earn from $50,000 to $99,999, and lastly, 31.5% of households that earn $100,000 or more per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Florida<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Hardee County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5343<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $41,395<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $65,000<\/p>\n<p>Florida has for sometime been a state riddled with income inequality. And the county with the greatest income inequality is Hardee County, which is located right in Central Florida, southeast of the Tampa Bay metro area and northeast of the Cape Coral-Fort Myers area. Its county seat is Wauchula, situated on U.S. Route 17 in Florida. Incomes in general in Hardee County are on the lower side, but there is still substantial inequality, with more than half of households (56.6%) earning less than $50,000 a year, while 28.3% of households earn between $50,000 and $100,000, and 15.1% of households earn $100,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Georgia<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Macon County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5796<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $33,163<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $56,218<\/p>\n<p>Out of the 50 counties in our study, Macon County has the seventh highest level of income inequality, with a Gini coefficient of 0.5796, significantly higher than the national Gini coefficient of 0.4818. A staggering 17.7% of households in Macon County earn less than $10,000 a year, with 64.5% of households earning less than $50,000 a year. This is in contrast to more than a fifth of households (21.7%) that earn between $50,000 and $100,000 a year, plus 13.6% of households that earn $100,000 or more a year. According to Data USA, the top industries by employment of the county\u2019s workforce are Manufacturing (123.2%), Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (13.7%), and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting (10.2%).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Hawaii<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Hawaii County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4747<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $68,399<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $91,885<\/p>\n<p>Hawaii\u2019s most unequal county in terms of income \u2014 Hawaii County \u2014 actually has the third lowest income inequality of the 50 counties in our list. With a Gini index of 0.4747, income inequality in Hawaii County is lower than the nationwide average. And this generally low inequality is reflected in the data. Approximately 37.2% of households in Hawaii County earn less than $50,000, while 30.3% of households earn $50,000 to $99,999, and at the top, 32.5% of households earn $100,000 or more per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Idaho<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Madison County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4909 (40<sup>th<\/sup> highest)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $53,498<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $77,337<\/p>\n<p>The county with the greatest income inequality in Idaho \u2014 Madison County \u2014 has a level of inequality very comparable to the national average. With a Gini index of 0.4909, Madison County is only slightly more unequal than the U.S. overall (Gini index of 0.4818). Just under a quarter of all households (24.1%) earn $100,000 or more per year, but the largest portion is made up of households earning $100,000 to $149,999 (16%), limiting the amount of really high-earners in Madison County. A little under half of all households (46.4%) earn less than $50,000 per year, while 29.7% of households earn $50,000 to $99,999.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Illinois<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Gallatin County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5286 (25<sup>th<\/sup> highest)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $92,069<\/p>\n<p>Located in the far southeast of Illinois, Gallatin County is the county with the highest income inequality in Illinois. Overall, it ranks right smack in the middle, 25<sup>th<\/sup> highest out of 50. Nearly half of all households (48.4%) earn less than $50,000 a year, while more than a fifth (21.2%) earn $100,000 or more a year. The county\u2019s top industries by employment are Retail Trade (18.2% of the workforce), Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (14.5%), and Manufacturing (12.9%).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Indiana<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Blackford County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4847 (44<sup>th<\/sup> highest)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $45,080<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $61,505<\/p>\n<p>The funny thing about the county with the highest income inequality in Indiana is that it\u2019s not that unequal. Its Gini index of 0.4847 is only slightly higher than the national figure of 0.4818. There\u2019s a very robust middle-income population in Blackford County, with 30.3% of households earning between $50,000 and $100,000 versus the true high-earners, those earning $100,000 or more a year, who make up 16% of all households. More than half of all households (53.7%) in Blackford County earn less than $50,000 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Iowa<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Adams County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5072 (33<sup>rd<\/sup> highest)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $57,981<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $85,877<\/p>\n<p>In the grand scheme of things, Iowa\u2019s most unequal county is on the lower end of the overall rankings. Iowa\u2019s county with the highest income inequality \u2014 Adams County \u2014 was 33<sup>rd<\/sup> out of 50, so it\u2019s not particularly notorious. And this makes sense, because with a Gini coefficient of 0.5072, Adams County is close to the midpoint between zero (complete income equality) and one (complete income inequality).<\/p>\n<p>Adams County does feature a recurring characteristic: Its main industries, in terms of percentage of the workforce employed, are a combination of healthcare and primary sectors, in this case the breakdown was Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (22.2%), Manufacturing (17.1%), and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting (13.3%).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Kansas<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Meade County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5423 (19<sup>th<\/sup> highest)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $66,042<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $113,325<\/p>\n<p>Located in southwestern Kansas, Meade County is an interesting entry on our list of the county with the highest income inequality in each state. Here, there\u2019s a solid middle-income segment, with 39.4% of households in Meade County earning $50,000 to $99,999. At the same time, there is a sizable upper-income segment, with 26.4% of households earning $100,000 or more \u2014 and, notably, 7.8% of all households earned $200,000 or more.<\/p>\n<p>The top-employing industries in Meade County are Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting (17.2% of the workforce), Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (15.2% of the workforce), and Educational Services (12% of the work force). Another startling data point is the gap between mean and median household income in Meade County, equal to a more than $47,000 difference.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Kentucky<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Knox County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5503 (13<sup>th<\/sup> highest)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $29,206<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $47,979<\/p>\n<p>Located in Appalachia, in southeastern Kentucky, Knox County is a notable coal-producing town. The largest industries in Knox County by employment are Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (18.1%), Retail Trade (13.9%), and Educational Services (12.2%). Meanwhile, the highest paying industries are Mining, Quarrying, &amp; Oil &amp; Gas Extraction (0.661% of the workforce), Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting, &amp; Mining 0.486% of the workforce), and Finance &amp; Insurance, &amp; Real Estate &amp; Rental &amp; Leasing 2.99% of the workforce).<\/p>\n<p>While Knox County has the highest income inequality in the state of Kentucky, this county is not like a Versailles-style ultra-wealthy on one pole and utterly poor at the other pole. Approximately 67.2% of households in Knox County earn less than $50,000 a year. This is pitted against 21.6% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999 a year and the 11.1% of households that earn $100,000 or more. This county\u2019s Gini index is quite high, so high that the level of income inequality in Knox County enabled it to place 13<sup>th<\/sup> out of 50.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Louisiana<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: East Carroll Parish<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.6860<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $25,049<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $60,718<\/p>\n<p>Located in the northeast corner of Louisiana, with its parish seat in the city of Lake Providence, East Carroll Parish is easily the county with the highest income inequality. Indeed, out of all 50 counties in the study, East Carroll Parish has the second highest Gini index. Compared to America\u2019s Gini index of 0.4818, East Carroll Parish\u2019s income inequality is roughly 42% higher than the national level. The huge $35,669 gap between median and mean household income shouldn\u2019t come as a surprise when a place has a Gini coefficient this high. More than two-thirds (68.6%) of households in East Carroll Parish earn less than $50,000, while another 18.4% earn between $50,000 and $100,000 and 13.1% earn $100,000 or more a year. Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (21.7% of the workforce), Public Administration (13.4% of the workforce), Retail Trade (11.6% of the workforce), and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting (9.46% of the workforce) are the top industries in terms of employment.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Maine<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Aroostook County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4624<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $47,278<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $63.636<\/p>\n<p>Out of all 50 counties included in our list of the counties with the highest income inequality in each state, Maine\u2019s Aroostook County ranked as the second lowest in terms of income inequality. Aroostook County\u2019s Gini index of 0.4624 is less than the U.S. Gini index of 0.4818.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Maryland<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Talbot County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4983<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $79,349<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $116,514<\/p>\n<p>Talbot County is situated on the central Eastern Shore of Maryland, across the Chesapeake from cities like Annapolis and Washington, D.C. Although Talbot County\u2019s Gini coefficient of 0.4983 makes it the county with the highest income inequality in Maryland, in the grand scheme, its inequality isn\u2019t too bad (it ranks 37<sup>th<\/sup> out of 50, and its Gini index is only slightly higher than the U.S. overall). As such, the distribution of household incomes is fairly balanced, with 30.7% of households earning less than $50,000 per year, 30.5% earning between $50,000 and $100,000, and 38.9% earning $100,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Massachusetts<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Suffolk County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5281<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $80,260<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $116,843<\/p>\n<p>Suffolk County covers much of the Boston area, including the city of Boston proper, Chelsea, Revere, and Winthrop. Suffolk is the county with the highest income inequality in Massachusetts, yet its incomes notably skew towards the high end. For instance, more than a third (35.6%) of households earn less than $50,000, while another 23% of households earn between $50,000 and $100,000 a year. However, both those segments are overshadowed by the 41.4% of households that earn $100,000 or more per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Michigan<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Wayne County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4906<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $52,830<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $74,894<\/p>\n<p>Wayne County covers much of the Detroit metro area, stretching down in the southwest to West Sumpter, in the northwest to Northville, and the northeast to Grosse Pointe; the county\u2019s eastern border is the border with Canada. Although its income inequality exceeds every other county in Michigan, Wayne County only has a Gini index of 0.4906, which isn\u2019t much higher than the U.S.\u2019s Gini index of 0.4818. The gap between median and average household income isn\u2019t too great, with 47.6% of households earning less than $50,000, 28.4% of households earning $50,000 to $99,999, and 24% of households earning $100,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Minnesota<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Stevens County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5123<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $65,750<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $95,156<\/p>\n<p>Stevens County is located far out there, in western, central Minnesota, right near the Lake Traverse Reservation. There is a gap of almost $30,000 between median household income and average household income. This distortion of the mean household income upward for Stevens County is due mainly to the 28.3% of households that earn at least $100,000 a year or more. In addition to them, 33% of households earn $50,000 to $99,999, while 38.6% of households earn less than $50,000. The three primary industries by employment, according to Data USA, are Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (15.8%), Educational Services (14.9%), and Manufacturing (13.4%).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Mississippi<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Humphreys County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5727<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $30,327<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $55,909<\/p>\n<p>Out of all 50 counties included in our list of the counties with the highest income inequality in every state, Humphreys County in Mississippi ranked as the eighth highest in terms of income inequality. Humphreys County\u2019s Gini index of 0.5727 is considerably higher than the U.S. Gini index of 0.4818. According to Data USA, the top three industries in Humphreys County by employment are Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (15.8% of the workforce), Manufacturing (15.8% of the workforce), and Retail Trade (10.6% of the workforce). The income distribution in Humphreys County is very lopsided, with nearly 70% (69.6%) of households earning less than $50,000 a year, while 18% of households earn from $50,000 to $99,999 and another 12.4% earn $100,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Missouri<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Adair County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5515<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $46,639<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $71,907<\/p>\n<p>Centered on Kirksville, in northeastern Missouri, Adair County has the highest income inequality in the state and ranks 12<sup>th<\/sup> out of 50 counties in terms of its inequality. The income distribution among households in Adair County is very uneven, with 52.6% of households earning less than $50,000 per year, against 28.1% of households earning between $50,000 and $100,000 per year, and 19.4% of households earning $100,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Montana<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Judith Basin County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5195<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $51,691<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $74,560<\/p>\n<p>Judith Basin County is about as close to the dead center of Montana as a county can get. With its county seat at the town of Stanford, Judith Basin County is pretty far from Montana\u2019s bigger cities, being, for instance, roughly 160 miles from Billings, the state\u2019s largest city. Judith Basin County has an intriguing employment breakdown. For example, the top occupational role in Judith Basin County is Management Occupations, accounting for 32.1% of the workforce. At the same time, the top industry by employment is Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting, which accounts for 41% of the workforce. Income inequality in Judith Basin County is fueled by uneven distribution, with 48.7% of households earning less than $50,000, while at the same time, more than a fifth of households (21.5%) earn $100,000 or more \u2014 indeed, almost 11% of households earn $200,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Nebraska<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Fillmore County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4931<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $66,410<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $96,007<\/p>\n<p>Named for President Millard Fillmore, Fillmore County has the highest income inequality in the state, but in the overall scheme of things, its Gini index of 0.4931 means that it\u2019s not that unequal. According to Data USA, the main industries by employment include Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting (14.7% of the workforce), Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (13.4% of the workforce), and Retail Trade (11.6% of the workforce). While 28.3% of households earn $100,000 or more per year in Fillmore County, this is balanced by the 38.4% of households earning less than $50,000 and the 33.3% of households earning $50,000 to $99,999 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Nevada<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Storey County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4752<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $66,713<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $93,984<\/p>\n<p>Storey County is simultaneously one of the least populated counties in Nevada and one of the fastest growing economies. Compared to the other counties on our list and nation in general, Nevada\u2019s most unequal county does not suffer from a high rate of income inequality. The income distribution over all households in Storey County is fairly even, with 37.6% of households earning less than $50,000 a year, 29.9% earning between $50,000 and $100,000 a year, and 32.5% earning $100,000 or more a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">New Hampshire<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Grafton County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4900<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $73,755<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $102,862<\/p>\n<p>New Hampshire\u2019s county with the greatest income inequality has a Gini index that\u2019s only slightly higher than the U.S.\u2019s Gini index of 0.4818. Still, with a Gini coefficient of 0.4900, Grafton County has the highest income inequality in the state. Both median and average household incomes are one the higher side. More than one third of households (35.3%) earn less than $50,000 per year, while a comparable 34.1% of households earn $100,000 or more per year. In the middle is the 30.6% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">New Jersey<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Essex County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5483<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $67,826<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $112,403<\/p>\n<p>The county in New Jersey with the highest income inequality \u2014 Essex County \u2014 has one of the biggest gaps between its average household income ($112,403) and median household income ($67,826): A difference of $44,577. This isn\u2019t too surprising once you know what areas the county covers: Northeastern New Jersey, just outside New York City, stretching from Newark in the east, to East and West Orange in the center, to Fairfield in the far northwest. This area includes lots of cities that have grown in both population and wealth due to the spillover from the New York City area, with more people willing to live in North Jersey and work in the Big Apple rather than live in the latter; the area also includes a lot of cities still recovering or stagnating from deindustrialization. Incomes are polarized between households earning less than $50,000 (38.7% of households) and those earning $100,000 or more (35.8% of households).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">New Mexico<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Harding County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.7279<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $35,900<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $142,117<\/p>\n<p>Harding County is one of the least populated counties in the U.S. Located out in the northeast of New Mexico, Harding County\u2019s Gini index of 0.7279 is the highest in the whole study. No doubt the low population helps distort the imbalance of income distribution in Harding County. Just shy of two-thirds of households (65.4%) earn less than $50,000 per year. Against this there is the 15.3% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999 a year and the 19.3% of households that earn $100,000 or more a year. What\u2019s even crazier is that more than one in 10 households earn $200,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">New York<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: New York County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5968<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $93,956<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $172,695<\/p>\n<p>New York County, in actuality, is just the borough of Manhattan. Hence, its extremely high median and mean household incomes, and its incredibly high Gini index of 0.5968, the fourth highest in the study. Household incomes are heavily skewed toward the high end, with 47.9% of all households earning $100,000 or more a year. Moreover, nearly a quarter of all households (24.9%) earn $200,000 or more a year. Meanwhile, 32.1% of households earn less than $50,000 per year and squeezed in between is the 20% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999 per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">North Carolina<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Bertie County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5517<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $37,571<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $59,138<\/p>\n<p>With a Gini coefficient of 0.5517, Bertie County has the highest income inequality in North Carolina; and out of the 50 counties in our final list, Bertie County\u2019s inequality was 11<sup>th<\/sup> highest. The county seat is located at Windsor, with Bertie County\u2019s eastern border being delimited by the Albemarle Sound and Chowan Rivers. Both median and average household incomes are very much on the low side, and an astonishing 19.5% of households earn $15,000 to $24,999. The portion of households that earn less than $50,000 a year is 62.7%, while more than a fifth (22.6%) of households earn $50,000 to $100,000 a year. Finally, there is a small though not insignificant proportion of households \u2014 14.6% \u2014 that earn $100,000 or more per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">North Dakota<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Cavalier County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5476<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $60,284<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $105,220<\/p>\n<p>North Dakota\u2019s county with the highest income inequality is located up north, along the Canadian border, between 120 and 130 miles from Winnepeg. The gap between average household income ($105,220) and median household income ($60,284) is substantial, at $44,936. There is roughly the same percentage of households that earn between $50,000 and $100,000 (30.2%) as households that earn $100,000 or more a year (30.7%).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Ohio<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Noble County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5122<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $46,144<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $70,433<\/p>\n<p>The county with the highest income inequality in Ohio is Noble County, which is centered on the county seat of Caldwell as well as on Interstate 77, which runs through it north-to-south. The county\u2019s top industries by employment, according to Data USA, are Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (17.6% of the workforce), Manufacturing (14.9% of the workforce), and Retail Trade (14% of the workforce). Close to a fifth of all households (19.1%) earn $100,000 or more per year, while more than half of all households (53.4%) earn less than $50,000 per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Oklahoma<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Roger Mills County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5496<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $58,385<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $90,856<\/p>\n<p>About 130 miles west of Oklahoma City, Roger Mills County lies on the border with the Texas Panhandle. The county\u2019s Gini coefficient of 0.5496 puts on among the top 15 counties with the highest income inequality in the study. Roger Mills County has a solid pillar of middle-income earners, with 19.1% of households making $50,000 to $75,000 a year. However, there\u2019s also a considerable proportion of households earning $100,000 or more \u2014 23.6% of households. Meanwhile, 45.8% of households earn less than $50,000 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Oregon<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Wasco County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4817<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $57,853<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $83,885<\/p>\n<p>Wasco County, located in Oregon, boasts the highest income inequality of all counties in the state, yet its Gini coefficient of 0.4817 is almost identical to the national figure of 0.4818. Delving into the numbers reveals a deeper story: While the median household income in the county sits at $57,853, the mean swells to a much higher $83,885, indicating that there are households with incomes considerably above the average. This is further evidenced by the fact that 42.7% of households earn less than $50,000 annually, painting a picture of a significant portion of the population struggling to make ends meet. Meanwhile, 34.4% of households fall into the $50,000 to $99,999 bracket, and a notable 22.9% command incomes of $100,000 or more a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Pennsylvania<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Philadelphia County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5178<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $52,649<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $77,454<\/p>\n<p>Like its name suggests, Philadelphia County is centered upon and covers the entire city of Philadelphia. With a Gini index of 0.5178, income inequality in Philadelphia County is worse than the U.S.\u2019s overall level, but it is still more equal than most of the 50 counties to make our list (ranking 28<sup>th<\/sup> out of 50). A little over one in 10 households (10.7%) earn less than $10,000 per year and 48.1% of households earn less than $50,000 per year. This is somewhat balanced by the 27.7% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999 per year and the 24.1% of households that earn $100,000 or more.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Rhode Island<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Bristol County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4890<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $95,102<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $132,141<\/p>\n<p>Similar to other New England states, the county with the highest income inequality in Rhode Island \u2014 Bristol County \u2014 doesn\u2019t have that bad of a Gini index: 0.4890 versus the U.S.\u2019s 0.4818. Bristol County is just southeast of Providence, covering key cities like Bristol, Warren, and Barrington. The county is certainly a high-income place, with both the median and average household incomes being above their corresponding national figures. As such, just under half of all households (47.7%) earn $100,000 or more a year, compared to 26.3% of households earning $50,000 to $99,999 and 26.1% of households earning less than $50,000 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">South Carolina<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Charleston County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5158<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $70,807<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $108,070<\/p>\n<p>Charleston County covers far more than just Charleston or its immediate environs. The county stretches roughly 40 miles northeast of the city of Charleston and covers a wide swathe of land to the west. Charleston County has the highest income inequality of any county in South Carolina, but this is mainly due to household incomes being skewed towards the higher end. For instance, roughly the same proportion of households in Charleston County earn less than $50,000 a year (36.2% of households) as do those that earn $100,000 or more (36% of households). In the middle is 27.8% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999 per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">South Dakota<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: McPherson County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5457<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $54,324<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $86,710<\/p>\n<p>McPherson County is located in northern South Dakota and lies along the border with North Dakota. It\u2019s a small county with only a couple thousand inhabitants. The distribution of incomes by household is all over the place in McPherson County, with peaks like 15.6% of households earning $15,000 to $24,999 and 19.4% of households earning $50,000 to $74,999 as well as 15.5% of households earning $100,000 to $149,999 a year, intermixed with valleys of low percentages. According to Data USA, the three main industries by employment include Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &amp; Hunting (22.9% of the workforce), Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (15.7% of the workforce), and Construction (11.2% of the workforce).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Tennessee<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Hancock County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5585<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $29,650<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $57,955<\/p>\n<p>Reportedly the fourth least populated county in Tennessee, Hancock County has the ninth highest level of income inequality in the study. With its county seat at Sneedville, Hancock County lies in northeastern Tennessee, bordering the western tail of Virginia. The income inequality here is less driven by a disproportionate number of high-earning households, and more driven by imbalances between lower-income households and middle-income households. For example, 26.7% of households in Hancock County earn between $50,000 and $100,000 a year, but a massive 63.8% of households earn less than $50,000 a year. Indeed, just under one fifth of all households (19.6%) earn $15,000 to $24,999 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Texas<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Sherman County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5881<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $55,667<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $111,110<\/p>\n<p>Located in the Texas Panhandle, due north of Amarillo, lies Sherman County. Sporting a Gini index of 0.5881, income inequality in Sherman County is the fifth highest in the study. The gap between the average household income ($111,110) and the median household income ($55,667) is an enormous $55,443. And while 29.5% of households earn incomes of $50,000 to $99,999 per year, that figure is easily matched by the 24.9% of households that earn $100,000 or more per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Utah<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Summit County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5044<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $116,351<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $176,064<\/p>\n<p>Summit County is a sprawling entity, stretching far into eastern Utah as well as west, encompassing the affluent city of Park City, which like Aspen in Colorado\u2019s most unequal county, is home to world-renowned ski resorts. Therefore, Summit County\u2019s high income inequality is due to incomes being skewed toward the higher side. An incredible 55.9% of households in Summit County earn $100,000 or more a year, compared to 24.7% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999, and just 19.3% of households that earn less than $50,000.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Vermont<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Lamoille County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5000<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $66,016<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $98,015<\/p>\n<p>Located east the city of Burlington and Lake Champlain, and not too far from the Canadian border, Lamoille County is Vermont\u2019s most unequal county in terms of income. Interestingly, its Gini index of 0.5000 is right at the midpoint of the Gini index\u2019s scale from zero to one. There is a substantial gap between average household income and median household income, of roughly $32,000. This is due in large part to the 30.6% of households that earn $100,000 or more a year versus the 32.5% that earn between $50,000 and $100,000, and the 36.8% that earn less than $50,000 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Virginia<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Charles City County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5194<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $59,543<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $87,501<\/p>\n<p>Charles City County lies along the banks of the James River, which forms its southern border, along with the Chickahominy River forming its eastern one. This Virginia county is situated in between Richmond and Newport News. Just over one quarter of the households in Charles City County earn $100,000 or more a year. This is counterbalanced by nearly two-fifths (39.6%) of households that earn less than $50,000 a year and another 35.3% of households that earn between $50,000 and $100,000 a year. The county\u2019s main industries, according to Data USA, are Manufacturing (12.5% of the workforce), Retail Trade (10.9% of the workforce), and Health Care &amp; Social Assistance (10.2% of the workforce).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Washington<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: San Juan County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5377<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $68,577<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $110,926<\/p>\n<p>Situated in the Salish Sea and at least a three-hour drive north by northwest of Seattle, San Juan County has the worst income inequality in Washington state. Just over a third of all households (33.9%) earn $100,000 or more a year, and a full 11% of households earn $200,000 or more. This stands against 30% of households that earn $50,000 to $99,999 and 36.1% of households that earn less than $50,000 a year. According to Data USA, the primary industries in terms of employment are Construction (13.5% of the workforce), Accommodation &amp; Food Services (9.46% of the workforce), and Retail Trade (9.17% of the workforce).<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">West Virginia<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Pleasants County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5551<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $58,433<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $97,696<\/p>\n<p>The county with the highest income inequality in West Virginia \u2014 Pleasants County \u2014 is in northern West Virginia, along the border with Ohio and not far from the city of Marietta on the Ohio River. With a Gini index of 0.5551, Pleasants County\u2019s level of income inequality is the 10<sup>th<\/sup> highest in the study. A surprisingly high proportion of households in the county \u2014 28.5% \u2014 earn $100,000 or more per year. Meanwhile, a comparable percentage of households earn $50,000 to $99,999 \u2014 29.4%. On the low end, 42.2% of households earn less than $50,000 a year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Wisconsin<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Sawyer County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.4921<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $53,011<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $77,394<\/p>\n<p>Located in northwestern Wisconsin, Sawyer County partially overlaps with the reservation of the Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians. Although its Gini coefficient of 0.4921 makes Sawyer County the one with the highest income inequality in Wisconsin, compared to the national overall, the county\u2019s level of inequality isn\u2019t too bad. Income distribution among households in Sawyer County takes on a bell-shaped curve: 46% of households earns less than $50,000; 34% of households earn between $50,000 and $100,000; and 20% of households earn $100,000 or more per year.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"subhead-embed color-accent bg-base font-accent font-size text-align\">Wyoming<\/h2>\n<p><strong>County with highest income inequality<\/strong>: Teton County<\/p>\n<p><strong>Gini index<\/strong>: 0.5297<\/p>\n<p><strong>Median household income<\/strong>: $94,498<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mean household income<\/strong>: $159,027<\/p>\n<p>Similar to Colorado\u2019s most unequal county \u2014 Pitkin County, home to Aspen \u2014 and Utah\u2019s most unequal county \u2014 Summit County, home to Park City \u2014 Teton County is home to the luxurious and distinguished Jackson Hole ski area. The high incomes of the inhabitants of this area are a prime contributor to the skew of income distribution toward the high end. Nearly half of all households (47.5%) earn $100,000 or more, while only 20.5% of households earn less than $50,000 a year and 31.9% of households earn $50,000 to $99,999 a year.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Read the full article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/andrewdepietro\/2023\/09\/07\/income-inequality-in-all-50-states-a-deep-dive-on-the-county-level\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and sometimes, stark contrasts. But in every state, there exists a county where these contrasts are most palpable \u2014 where the divide between the opulent and the struggling is not just a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8242,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-8241","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-finance"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>A Deep Dive on the County Level | Prosfunds<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Deep Dive on the County Level | Prosfunds\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Prosfunds\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-07T16:17:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-07T16:17:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1694103426_0x0.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"News Room\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"News Room\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"30 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"News Room\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bab8f1b00ccebe43e39ff640793108e6\"},\"headline\":\"A Deep Dive on the County Level\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-07T16:17:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-07T16:17:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241\"},\"wordCount\":5960,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Finance\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241\",\"name\":\"A Deep Dive on the County Level | Prosfunds\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-07T16:17:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-07T16:17:07+00:00\",\"description\":\"In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Deep Dive on the County Level\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/\",\"name\":\"Funding Factories\",\"description\":\"Latest Finance News and Updates\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Funding Factories\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ff-dark-logo-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ff-dark-logo-1.png\",\"width\":780,\"height\":140,\"caption\":\"Funding Factories\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bab8f1b00ccebe43e39ff640793108e6\",\"name\":\"News Room\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/avatar_user_1_1693518183-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/avatar_user_1_1693518183-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"News Room\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Deep Dive on the County Level | Prosfunds","description":"In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Deep Dive on the County Level | Prosfunds","og_description":"In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and","og_url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241","og_site_name":"Prosfunds","article_published_time":"2023-09-07T16:17:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-07T16:17:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1694103426_0x0.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"News Room","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"News Room","Est. reading time":"30 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241"},"author":{"name":"News Room","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bab8f1b00ccebe43e39ff640793108e6"},"headline":"A Deep Dive on the County Level","datePublished":"2023-09-07T16:17:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-07T16:17:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241"},"wordCount":5960,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Finance"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241","url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241","name":"A Deep Dive on the County Level | Prosfunds","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-09-07T16:17:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-07T16:17:07+00:00","description":"In the massive and eclectic mosaic that is America, each county tells its own unique story, interwoven with threads of hope, ambition, dreams, and","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?p=8241#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Deep Dive on the County Level"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/","name":"Funding Factories","description":"Latest Finance News and Updates","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#organization","name":"Funding Factories","url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ff-dark-logo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ff-dark-logo-1.png","width":780,"height":140,"caption":"Funding Factories"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/bab8f1b00ccebe43e39ff640793108e6","name":"News Room","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/avatar_user_1_1693518183-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/avatar_user_1_1693518183-96x96.png","caption":"News Room"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/prosfunds.com"],"url":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8243,"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8241\/revisions\/8243"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/prosfunds.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}